How Private Oil Companies Face the Anti-monopoly Law in China

Since October 2008, Private oil companies in China have been urging one another to take advantage of the Anti-Monopoly Law(AML) to secure a stable supply of oil and avoid over-reliance on the country's two major oil producers for survival. They want new policies to create a level playing field. Currently they depend on the oil supplies of the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) and the China Petroleum and Chemicals Corporation (Sinopec) as they are forbidden by law to extract or import their own.

 

Continue Reading...

Foreign Judgments and Chinese Courts - A Mixed Bag...Be Aware!

The question of whether a foreign judgment is capable of being enforced in China should be taken into account by all foreign investors who see China as a potential ground for expansion and development. The following should provide some clarity:

 

Article 126 of the Contract Law of the People's Republic of China states:

 

"Parties to a contract with a foreign element may choose the law to apply to the handling of disputes, unless otherwise provided by law. If parties to a contract with a foreign element have not made a choice, the law of the State with the closest connection applies"
 

Continue Reading...

The Threshold of Concentration: Anti-monopoly Notification in China

During the drafting of the Chinese Anti-monopoly Law (AML), the level at which the threshold of concentration notification was to be set, aroused fierce debate. In the end however, AML did not specifically stipulate the notification criteria in detail.Article 21 of AML states:

 

Business operators shall declare in advance the concentration reaching the threshold of declaration prescribed by the State Council to the Anti-monopoly Law Enforcement Agency, otherwise, they shall not implement the concentration.

 

Such a vaguely worded clause has caused confusion within the legal profession. It certainly begs the question: Why did AML not explicitly stipulate the threshold of notification? Examining both the lawmaking process prior to the creation of AML as well as the drafting of AML itself may prove to be helpful. 

 

Continue Reading...

CIRC Compliance Guidelines: Implementation for Chinese Insurance Companies

In the Chinese insurance market, it is common practice for a company to try to strengthen its supervision capabilities. In the past, special emphasis has been placed on supervision within departments – however, this is often inefficient. Therefore, financial regulatory institutions are beginning to focus on preventing risk by promoting internal supervisory mechanisms and the principle of compliance management.


Since Ping An Insurance Group initiated the establishment of the “Law & Compliance Department” in 2004 and theChina Insurance Regulatory Commission (CIRC) issued the Guidelines of Standardizing Governance Structure of Insurance Companies in January 2006 which state that insurance companies are required to establish a mechanism of compliance management to strengthen the inspection and evaluation of compliance, other domestic insurance companies have followed suit. In 2007, CIRC issued the formal Guidelines for the Compliance Management of Insurance Companies (hereafter Compliance Guidelines) which provide direct policy guidelines for the establishment of departments of compliance.
 

Continue Reading...

Just Move, A Big Step-comments on the draft of new insurance law of China

The Chinese legislator recently published the draft of the Chinese Insurance Law (revised). The draft is inherently different from the present Insurance Law of the People's Republic of China. Therefore, the draft should be deemed as new rather than revised.


The current Insurance Law has aroused fierce and serious criticism since its promulgation in 1995 and subsequent revision in 2002. Those who are insured, insurers, brokers, agents, loss adjusters and regulators are not satisfied with the current regulatory position surrounding the Insurance Law. The reasons which stem from this dissatisfaction are multiple.
 

Continue Reading...

Who "Directs" the Directors of Chinese Insurance Companies

On July 8th 2008, the China Insurance Regulatory Commission (CIRC) promulgated the Guidelines on the Operation of the Board of Directors of Insurance Companies (the Guidelines) whose provisions are, compared with the Guiding Opinion on Regulating the Corporate Governance of Insurance Companies promulgated in 2006, more specific in many aspects such as in the qualification of directors, the operation of directors board and its professional committee, secretary and assistant institutions of the directors board and corporate governance reports. The Guidelines, together with the Interim Measures for the regulation of Insurance Companies' Independent Directors and the Interim Measures for the regulation of Affiliate Transaction of Insurance Companies, compose the primary system regulating the board of directors of insurance companies.

Continue Reading...

China: Supreme People's Court Issues Judicial Explanation Regarding Liquidation

Recently, China’s Supreme Court issued a Judicial Explanation relating to the enforcement of the Company Law of the PRC. The focus of this Explanation is legal responsibility when company liquidation occurs.


 

Continue Reading...

Bad Faith and China's Insurance Market: A Classic Example

The issue of “bad faith” has plagued the insurance market in China and has proven to be a major hurdle in the Chinese insurance market’s development. Below is a case which provides insight into the presence of bad faith at the local level.


In February 2009, a defendant (the insured) was sentenced to eight months imprisonment for refusing to transfer insurance proceeds to the injured party. The ruling was given by Haidian local court, Beijing, China.


In 2007, a car accident occurred in Beijing, involving the defendant and claimant, Mr. Sun. The claimant sued the defendant in a Chinese local court and the Chinese court issued a judgment in favor of claimant; ruling the defendant assumed full responsibility and should indemnify the claimant for the loss of 43,000 RMB ( approximately 6,300 USD).


The defendant received the proceeds form his insurer, resulting from the car accident, however, he refused to pay the proceeds to claimant. Furthermore, to escape enforcement of the judgment, the defendant fraudulently transferred property titles in his name, including the title to a car.


The enforcement department of the local Chinese court stated the actions of the defendant violate the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China. The case was then transferred to the Criminal Division in the court.


The case provides an example of the problem of “bad faith” within the Chinese insurance market. As many Chinese Insurance lawyers would agree, the issue surrounding and the problems arising from “bad faith” in the Chinese insurance market must be resolved. A suitable start would involve the Chinese courts strengthening enforcement of their judgments which would discourage immoral behavior.

 

The AML sword, How Chinese Courts "hold" it ?

November 2008, Mr. Xi Xiaoming, Vice Chief Justice of the Chinese Supreme Court, informed the media the Chinese Supreme Court would initiate drafting of judicial explanations complimenting the Chinese Anti-monopoly Law (AML). Before such formal expression, another Justice in the No.3 Civil Division of the Chinese Supreme Court publicly stated plaintiffs may file civil AML cases directly, bypassing the wait for administrative decisions.

Due to the characteristic of the AML, the administrative departments, other than courts, are the leading force in law enforcement. Presently, there is uncertainty in the AML administrative procedure and administrative departments take caution in announcements and practices. In such an atmosphere, Chinese courts come to the front.
 

Continue Reading...

China and Issues surrounding international commercial arbitration and the 1958 New York Convention

Article 1 of the New York Convention states "this Convention shall apply to the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards made in the territory of a State other than the State where the recognition and enforcement of such awards are sought, and arising out of differences between persons, whether physical or legal. It shall also apply to arbitral awards not considered as domestic awards in the State where their recognition and enforcement are sought."

Continue Reading...

Chinese Insurance Law Legislation needs Improvement for Adequate Governance

The first Insurance Law in China came into force in 1995 and was amended in 2002. There have been no other additional changes or modifications to the Insurance Law. Although the Chinese Supreme Court has drafted an Explanation to the Enforcement of the Insurance Law, these rules have yet to be utilized in practice. Thus, it is clear that the rules and regulations governing insurance in China has failed to keep pace with the rapid development in the market.  

Continue Reading...

The Chinese Insurance Market is Developing at a Rapid Pace

China has experienced unprecedented growth in the insurance field. The total amount of premiums reached 100,611,940,000 USD in 2007. The total amount of premiums reached 80,672,020,000 USD in 2006 ranking it eleventh out of all countries in the world. Moreover, the total financial holdings of insurance companies in 2007 amounted to 414,756,056,000 USD, one-third larger than total holdings in 2005. Presently, there are more than 100 insurance companies in China, and more than 3000 insurance intermediary companies which include businesses specializing in broker, agency, and loss adjuster services.

Continue Reading...

Chinese Insurance Market has Urgent Need for Professional Lawyers

China has one of the fastest growing insurance markets in the world. The number of professional insurance lawyers cannot meet the demand in the market due to the limited history of both the legal and insurance industry within China. 

 

Continue Reading...

The Concept of Concentration under Chinese Anti-trust Law

It is difficult to overstate the importance of concentration control regulations in the broader context of Chinese Anti-trust law as regulated by the Anti-monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China (Anti-monopoly). No area of anti-monopoly enforcement commands closer scrutiny or arouses more impassioned debate. In fact, creating a proper definition for concentration was the most vigorously contested issue during the drafting of the new Anti-monopoly Law.

Continue Reading...